Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | One Health Advances

Fig. 2

From: Comparative efficacy of eravacycline and tigecycline in addressing multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

Fig. 2

MIC distribution of tigecycline, omadacycline, and eravacycline in strains carrying no mobile tigecycline resistance genes: A Escherichia coli, B Klebsiella pneumoniae, C Acinetobacter spp., and D Enterobacter cloacae. Statistical significance was determined using the Kruskal–Wallis test, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. For P values, ns (not significant) indicates P > 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ****, P ≤ 0.0001

Back to article page

One Health Advances

ISSN: 2731-9970

Contact us